Friday, July 5, 2013

Andrew Coyne on FPP and polarizing politics

In a National Post column, Toronto voting proposal might be last shot at electoral reform in Canada, conservative columnist Andrew Coyne points out how First-Past-the-Post rewards polarizing politics while Preferential Voting (ranked ballot) ends them. (Partisans won’t benefit from obnoxious politics under Proportional Representation either, which Mr. Coyne also supports.)

“When a candidate needs only a small slice of the electorate to win he has little incentive to make himself less obnoxious to the rest; indeed, he has every incentive to amp up the us-and-them rhetoric, the better to lock down his support.
“With a ranked ballot, on the other hand, it’s not enough merely to have the most votes. You have to get a majority. Vote-splitting thus ceases to be an issue: Voters can mark a 1 beside their preferred candidate in good conscience, knowing that their second and third choices will also be counted. And because a candidate will typically need those second and third choices to win, he now has an incentive, not to attack and divide, but to reach out to supporters of other parties.”

No comments:

Post a Comment